|
by James GOH
A new method of accurately fabricating
artificial legs promises to get amputees
back on their feet rapidly.
ne perennial problem faced in the production of artificial
limbs is satisfactory socket fit. The patient may suffer
pain arising from poor fit or an inability to use the limb
effectively. This means returning to the doctor or prosthetist for
refitting the limb, or revision of appliance and subsequent help
with the adjustment until he or she feels comfortable with it.
Scientists at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the
Division of Bioengineering at the National University of Singapore
have developed an accurate yet speedy method of making an
artificial leg. Their hydrostatic pressure-casting technique facilitates
fabrication of a direct-pressure cast socket out of braided carbon
fibre in just two hours.
Lower limb prosthesis consists of a socket, a shank, and a
foot. The socket, enclosing the stump (or residual limb), forms
the most important component of the artificial limb because it
represents the initial interface between human and machine.
The prosthetic socket supports and distributes the full weight
of the wearer, especially at mid-stance when walking. Even the
best surgical technique cannot compensate for a poor-fitting
prosthesis simply because the stump does not have the same
weight-bearing capability as the sole of the normal foot. The skill
and the experience of the prosthetist in designing and fitting a
comfortable socket often determine successful rehabilitation of a
patient who had undergone amputation.
The Direct Pressure Cast (DPCast) Prosthetic Socket for
Transtibial Amputees technique devised by the NUS researchers
adopts a fresh design approach. The technique is based on the
hydrostatic pressure casting concept in which fluid facilitates
uniform pressure around the stump. Pascal's principle of fluid
mechanics assumes that fluid pressure and any additional pressure
(as from a prosthetic socket) will be transmitted equally to every
point in the fluid.
The most notable difference between the DPCast and a
conventional patellar (knee cap)-tendon-bearing (PTB) socket is
the absence of indentations at the knee tendon and the back of the
kneecap area. Another enhancement is that whereas the mechanics
of the PTB socket must be defined for each progression phase of
the gait, the DPCast socket simply assumes that pressure at one
point will be transferred to other accommodating soft tissue.
In addition, prosthetists can fabricate the DPCast socket using
a quick-curing material like braided carbon fibre impregnated
with resins instead of the traditional lamination method. The
resin-impregnated carbon fibre is draped over the stump and
then inserted into the PCast tank. The hydrostatic pressure is then
introduced into the system until the patient stands with the pelvis
levelled. When fully cured and hardened, the carbon-fibre socket is
removed from the stump and used to form the final DPCast socket.
This method does away with the positive plaster mould and reduces
the usual multiple-stage process to a two-stage method.
The PCast socket has been successfully fitted onto ten subjects.
Preliminary gait studies showed no significant differences between
the subjects' original socket and the DPCast socket; therefore,
this technique has fabricated a comfortably fitting socket. It also
reduces the amount of skill required on the part of the technician
fabricating the socket, resulting in the reduction of fitting error,
time, and cost. Moreover, because the pressure casting technique
demands little expertise, it has great potential in developing
countries where prosthetic proficiency is lacking.
The project won the first prize at Singapore's first Assistive
Technology Invention competition organised by the Society for
the Physically Disabled's Specialised Assistive Technology Centre
in collaboration with the Institute for Infocomm Research. It also
received an Honourable Mention at the recent Asian Innovation
Awards organised by The Asian Wall Street Journal and the
Singapore Economic Development Board. The intellectual property
rights to the invention remains with the inventors, who hope to
interest the industry in taking up the idea to develop and market
it commercially
Click here to download the full issue for USD 6.50
|