n most in vitro fertilisation (IVF) centres, embryos are
placed into a patient’s uterus on the second or third day
at the four- or eight-cell stages, respectively. Although
high pregnancy rates can result with such day-2 or day-3 transfers,
some studies show that the transfer of five-day-old embryos
(blastocysts) can enhance pregnancy outcome.
There are three justifications for this statement. First, more
physiological viability exists in returning a blastocyst to the uterine
environment than returning an earlier cleavage-stage embryo
because the uterine environment is designed to be most receptive
to the four- or five-day-old human embryo. Second, only the
hardiest embryos will survive in culture for five days, and third,
embryo selection is better and more precise with day-5 embryos.
Some researchers have claimed that because higher implantation
rates result from blastocyst transfers, the transfer of one blastocyst
will avoid a multiple-sibling pregnancy (one side effect of IVF). Other
scientists believe that appearance alone under the microscope of
day-3 embryos poorly predicts future blastocyst quality and that no
correlation exists between blastulation rates of cultured spare embryos
and transfers on day 2 or 3 in the same patients. Additional studies
report contradictory views that blastocyst transfers alone were no
better than day-3 transfers in IVF patients.
It is important to understand the physiology and behaviour of
the human embryo in the first five days after fertilisation. A human
embryo’s genetic makeup activates between day 2 and 3 of growth,
following which the embryo takes full control of its own
developmental fate. Until this time the mother’s genome fully
controls early embryonic development. If the embryo lacks some
very special nutrients and other environmental conditions
conducive for healthy development between day 2 and 3, "human
in vitro embryonic block" occurs - the embryo ceases to grow.
Thus, transferring embryos after day 2 in IVF patients should
theoretically be beneficial. However, transfer done before it is
clear that the embryos have not undergone the block could result
in some undesirable in vitro carry-over effects from the first and
second days spent in the laboratory.
Extending culture to five days also gives embryologists time
to weed out genetically inferior embryos. With continuing
development of good embryos, a better selection of blastocysts
for transfer remains. One study showed that IVF patients with a
poor prognosis had more than 50% genetically abnormal embryos.
In another study, 40% of blastocysts in extended culture showed
chromosomal mosaicism (a group of disorders comprising numerical
or structural chromosomal irregularities) of the inner cell mass
from which the future foetus arises.
Although extended culture has several benefits, it also involves
certain challenges. Growth of human embryos to blastocysts
requires stringent quality control and close monitoring of the
embryos’ laboratory environment for five days. Embryos require a
complex nourishing culture medium on days 1 and 2 and are
switched to a second super-complex nourishing medium from
days 3 to 5, making increased incubator space necessary for five
days to avoid fluctuations of pH and osmolarity arising from
frequent opening and closing of incubator doors.
Doctors cannot guarantee all patients signed up for IVF a
blastocyst transfer because blastulation rates rarely exceed 60-
70%. Older patients, who usually generate fewer eggs, have similarly
fewer blastocysts. Some IVF centres have laid down specific criteria
for transfer, such as availability of a minimum of four to five good
embryos on day 3 so as to increase the chances of pregnancy but
also to ensure availability of one or two blastocysts for transfer on
day 5.
Some centres have even proposed predictive criteria to identify
as early as day 1 the best embryos to yield blastulation, implantation,
and pregnancy whereas others have developed a graduated
embryo-scoring system based on appearance under special
microscopes, after scoring embryos for quality on days 1 to 3.
The IVF programme at the National University Hospital in
Singapore comprises caring and dedicated embryologists with long
years of experience with extended culture. They have refined the
extended culture protocol to attain high pregnancy rates of at least
50-55%. Embryo transfer is carried out after the in vitro embryonic
block on either day 3, 4, or 5 and not day 5 alone. The protocol
virtually guarantees a patient embryo transfer on any of these days
instead of targeting her for a day-5 blastocyst transfer only.
The pregnancy rates rise linearly with day 3, 4, and 5 transfers
when compared to day 2. The laboratory protocol incorporates:
- an integrated daily egg and embryo scoring system from day 0 to 5.
- a brief two-hour exposure of sperm and egg for fertilisation (instead of overnight exposure) or the microinjection of a single sperm into an egg.
- extended culture of embryos in a small controlled environment using small plastic incubators and two-stage gas environments.
- growth of individual embryos in microdroplets of stagespecific sequential culture media.
- decision about day of transfer made by an embryologist on duty who specialises on embryo development, relying on high cumulative embryo scores.
Patients were more comfortable if told upfront that they would
be targeted for day 5 transfers and that if a hint of no blastocyst
production after daily embryo scoring by day 3 remained, they
would still get a day 3 or 4 transfer with high pregnancy rates. In
this way, no patient went home disappointed if she did not have
a blastocyst transfer.
Selecting embryos that have a high implantation potential is
one of the major contributory factors to improved results in an
IVF programme. Embryo quality has traditionally been evaluated
on the basis of speed of growth and appearance under the
microscope on the day of transfer. This single evaluation lacks
sensitivity and specificity in predicting pregnancy outcome,
prompting IVF specialists to transfer more embryos (up to four),
leading in turn to increased multiple-foetus rates.
Although it is tempting to correlate egg and embryo scoring
with implantation, other variables exist beyond this screening. Thus,
one parameter used in isolation to determine outcome must be
viewed with caution. Other parameters such as a standardised
microdroplet culture, using stage-specific culture media, a brief
two-hour insemination, and a standardised ultrasound-guided
embryo transfer, plus the egg and embryo scoring, all contribute
to high pregnancy rates in one way or another.
For more information contact Ariff Bongso at obgbongs@nus.edu.sg
|