SEX
AND RELIGION
The technology offered by the Internet can dramatically increase the scale
of what was a “traditional” service — mail-order brides and other forms
of matchmaking activities. This scale is increased at both the demand and
supply side — by allowing more clients, mainly men, to seek partners from
Third-World countries, and by enabling more countries to be involved in
such schemes.
Another example is sex tourism, which can be disguised under the cloak
of tourism, and within this, under a number of other seemingly innocent
guises romance, adventure, and even culture.
The Internet has become an important vehicle for the promotion of sex
tourism because of the need for highly localised information, and the
added bonus of privacy when it comes to information delivery. When travelling
to any place in the world, there are websites that can tell you where
to go to for sexual services, how much you have to pay for them, and even
some accounts of those who have visited these places.
However, information and action flow both ways on the Internet. When
addressing these issues through its website, human rights organisation
Equality Now urges its readers to take action against sex tour operators
by writing to their law enforcement agencies. I found several excellent
pieces addressing the issue on other websites, two from Donna Hughes of
the University of Rhode Island, and one from Natalie Collins of the University
of California ? Los Angeles.
On the topic of religion, how do communities of faith maintain ideological
purity and fervour in an increasingly pluralistic climate wherein the
broadcast and interactive functions of the Internet have enabled a proliferation
of ideologies and identities? A personal experience may serve as an illustration.
Two years ago, the Trinity Theological Seminary in Singapore assembled
a group of theologians and professionals to debate the issue “Homosexuality
and the Church”. I was invited to present a sociological perspective.
The team spent a year or so writing and discussing each of the six papers.
Towards the end of the project, we met up with a group of gay Christians
at their request.
What struck me in this session was a casual remark that the gay community
in Singapore had already “scrutinised” and debated the implications drawn
from our papers. E-mail and many of the gay web pages on the Internet
have no doubt significantly contributed to this debate. These websites,
some with their own chat functions, represent more specific examples of
how the Internet has allowed such special interest groups to flourish
by providing information resources and various forms of support.
The proliferation of information over the Internet has also provided
a wider spectrum of viewpoints on all issues. For example, Exodus International
manages a website that represents conservative Christian viewpoints on
homosexuality. On the other side, the Skeptic Tank website is dedicated
to “exposing destructive beliefs and ideologies”, including conservative
homosexual viewpoints.
These examples indicate an important point. In the digital information
age, it becomes increasingly difficult (but not impossible) to maintain
moral and ideological stances because of incessant challenges from competing
viewpoints.
This has implications for governments in their defence of foreign policy;
corporations in protecting their business practices; religious and ethnic
communities in preserving and propagating their beliefs and ways of life,
and parents in how they socialise their children. As a father of three
young children, I often wonder how the Internet will impact the next generation.
In the digital age, one major challenge to today’s parents is ploughing
through the information maze in order to explain consequences with much
greater clarity than our parents needed to do. As communities of fate
increasingly face competition from communities of choice, we need to ensure
that the personal choices our children make are informed ones.
A historian writing about Finland suggested that the Finns embrace new
technology with great passion because they have a weak craft tradition
and a general infatuation with modernity.
Too many societies share this enthusiasm. In our rush to be passionate
adopters, we need to be mindful of the social consequences, both good
and bad, of such embraces.
We should indeed feel attracted and repelled by the Internet at the very
same time.
Associate Professor K C Ho is the co-ordinator of the
Information and Communication Management Programme at the Faculty of Arts
and Social Sciences. To contact him, please write to: icmhokc@nus.edu.sg
|